One controversial area of naming your child really surprised me – naming your older adopted child. I just assumed that when people adopted a child who was old enough to talk and identify himself by name, the child kept his name. Apparently that is not the case in many families. See the links under "Related Topics" at the bottom of this post for further discussion of this issue.
The reason I always assumed that a child would keep his name is because he already identifies himself by that name. I could see where it would be confusing to have lived for 5 or 6 years with the name Bob and then suddenly have everyone calling you Fred. If you identify with the name Bob, it seems like it would be hard to have the name Fred “forced” upon you.
That being said, there are situations in which it might be best to change an older adopted child’s name. For example, if you adopt a child internationally whose name is very difficult to pronounce in English, it might be easier on the child to adjust to a new name rather than have to struggle with hearing his name butchered each time anyone tries to address him.
If I were to adopt an older child, I would probably ask the child if he wanted to change his name and then talk with him about his reasons for wanting to change it. Unlike with adopting an infant, I believe that a child should have a say in what he is going to be called. If a child really wants to be called by his birth name and is old enough to tell you this, then I would be inclined to respect his wishes. I welcome any thoughts to the contrary.
Related Topics: