Ok, a few days ago, I posted my opinions regarding the re-naming of adopted children from foreign countries.
Although I still stand by my opinion that a name is a name...celebrate the culture and don't worry about what others say...there are some very passionate people out there in the adoption community that beg to differ, so I want to share their points of view, as well.
The people I have spoken to in regards to re-naming adopted children state that many times all a child has is their name. That is their one and only connection to what they had...their country, their birth parents, their culture.
To strip the name from the child as if they were always English, to them, is denying or cheating them out of their heritage, and that's why they are so passionate about either keeping the child's birth name all together, OR to make some part of their birth name be their middle name...just as long as it's in there somewhere.
SPONSOR
I have heard many positive remarks regarding successful usage of children's birth names and I commend those folks for finding a balance that works for them.
To me, I still believe that it's not that necessary, especially in the case of an infant, to use the birth given name...HOWEVER, these folk's opinions are DEFINITELY worth merit, and I appreciate all of the responses that are PRO keeping the birth name vs. changing the child's name.
Until Tonight,
Storm